Negative Versioning: The Only Honest Way to Version Software

Semantic versioning? Too subjective.
Zero-based versioning? Better, but still too optimistic.
Negative versioning? Finally, a system that acknowledges reality.

Let’s face it—code is a liability. Every line written is a future bug, a future support tic…


This content originally appeared on DEV Community and was authored by Emmanuel Gonzalez

Semantic versioning? Too subjective.
Zero-based versioning? Better, but still too optimistic.
Negative versioning? Finally, a system that acknowledges reality.

Let’s face it—code is a liability. Every line written is a future bug, a future support ticket, a future "unexpected behavior" that some poor soul will have to explain in a meeting. So why are we numbering our software as if progress is real? Negative versioning is the answer.

Why Negative Versioning?

🔹 Honesty – Every new release makes things worse before they get better. Might as well admit it upfront.
🔹 Manages expectations – Users won’t complain about bugs in v-3.4.2 when they knew what they were signing up for.
🔹 Encourages maintenance – The only way to reach v0.0.0 is to refactor, optimize, and delete unnecessary code.
🔹 Reflects real-world debt – Your technical debt isn’t at version 5.0, it’s at version -5.0, and we all know it.

Special Numbering for Special Cases

Of course, sales teams still need a way to promise "game-changing innovations" that don’t actually exist. That’s where imaginary numbers come in:

🔸 v√-1.0.0 – A feature so ahead of its time it technically doesn’t exist. Perfect for roadmap slides.
🔸 vπ.0.0 – A feature that was estimated for this quarter, but will never truly be finished.
🔸 v-∞.0.0 – Legacy enterprise software. No one knows when it started or how it still runs.

With negative versioning, we stop pretending software is a smooth progression toward perfection and embrace the beautiful, chaotic mess that it really is.

Welcome to v-1.0.0. It's all downhill from here.


This content originally appeared on DEV Community and was authored by Emmanuel Gonzalez


Print Share Comment Cite Upload Translate Updates
APA

Emmanuel Gonzalez | Sciencx (2025-02-09T04:57:57+00:00) Negative Versioning: The Only Honest Way to Version Software. Retrieved from https://www.scien.cx/2025/02/09/negative-versioning-the-only-honest-way-to-version-software/

MLA
" » Negative Versioning: The Only Honest Way to Version Software." Emmanuel Gonzalez | Sciencx - Sunday February 9, 2025, https://www.scien.cx/2025/02/09/negative-versioning-the-only-honest-way-to-version-software/
HARVARD
Emmanuel Gonzalez | Sciencx Sunday February 9, 2025 » Negative Versioning: The Only Honest Way to Version Software., viewed ,<https://www.scien.cx/2025/02/09/negative-versioning-the-only-honest-way-to-version-software/>
VANCOUVER
Emmanuel Gonzalez | Sciencx - » Negative Versioning: The Only Honest Way to Version Software. [Internet]. [Accessed ]. Available from: https://www.scien.cx/2025/02/09/negative-versioning-the-only-honest-way-to-version-software/
CHICAGO
" » Negative Versioning: The Only Honest Way to Version Software." Emmanuel Gonzalez | Sciencx - Accessed . https://www.scien.cx/2025/02/09/negative-versioning-the-only-honest-way-to-version-software/
IEEE
" » Negative Versioning: The Only Honest Way to Version Software." Emmanuel Gonzalez | Sciencx [Online]. Available: https://www.scien.cx/2025/02/09/negative-versioning-the-only-honest-way-to-version-software/. [Accessed: ]
rf:citation
» Negative Versioning: The Only Honest Way to Version Software | Emmanuel Gonzalez | Sciencx | https://www.scien.cx/2025/02/09/negative-versioning-the-only-honest-way-to-version-software/ |

Please log in to upload a file.




There are no updates yet.
Click the Upload button above to add an update.

You must be logged in to translate posts. Please log in or register.