This content originally appeared on DEV Community and was authored by Wano sike
Okay, real talk. For most of us, Ethereum was our first love in Web3 dev. ❤️ It’s the granddaddy, the blueprint, the "this is how we’ve always done it" chain. So when NEAR pops up, we’re not just asking "What’s this?"—we’re asking "How does it even compare?" 🤔
And look, this isn’t about throwing shade at Ethereum. 🙅♂️ It’s about being a dev who actually cares about trade-offs. Ethereum went all-in on security and decentralization (which is why it’s a tank 💪), while NEAR? It was built from scratch to balance security with usability and crazy-good scalability. Let’s break it down. 🔍
Scaling: "Coming Soon" 🚧 vs. "It’s Already Here" ✅
This is where things get real.
Ethereum: The Monolith with a To-Do List 📜
Yeah, we all know Ethereum’s expensive and clogs up fast. 🐌 The big fix? Danksharding—someday. ⏳ Until then, if you want scale, you’re stuck juggling L2s. Sure, you get Ethereum’s ironclad security 🔒, but now you’re dealing with a dozen different rollups, bridges 🌉, and their weird little quirks. Fun. 😅NEAR: Sharding? Done. 🎯
NEAR’s Nightshade sharding isn’t some future promise—it’s live. No L2 band-aids, no ecosystem fragmentation. Just one smooth L1 that scales as you grow. 📈 As a dev, that’s huge. No bridge headaches 🤯, no picking sides—just build and let the network handle the rest.
My take? Ethereum’s L2s are powerful but messy. If you want simplicity now, NEAR’s sharding is a breath of fresh air. 🌬️
Dev Life: Battle-Tested 🛡️ vs. Next-Gen ⚡
Let’s talk tools. 🛠️
Ethereum: The Comfort Zone 🛋️
EVM is everywhere. Solidity devs? Tons. Hardhat, Ethers.js, endless docs? 📚 Yep. If you want a massive safety net and tools that’ve been through hell and back, Ethereum’s your home. 🏠NEAR: The New Hotness 🔥
Rust or AssemblyScript, fresh tooling, and a stack built for sharding. Yeah, there’s a learning curve 📈 (especially if Solidity’s your jam), but Rust’s speed 🚀 and NEAR’s architecture? Chef’s kiss. 👨🍳 And if you really need EVM, Aurora’s got your back.
My take? If you love the EVM comfort blanket 🧸, stick with Ethereum. But if you’re down to learn something faster and sleeker? NEAR’s worth the switch. 🔄
UX: 0xNightmare 😱 vs. Human-Friendly 😍
This is where NEAR shines. ✨
Ethereum: "0x9a3b… Wait, Did I Copy That Right?" 🤦♂️
Those wallet addresses? A UX disaster. No one likes them. No one understands them. And Ethereum’s never really fixed it.NEAR: "yourname.near" + Gas? Who Cares! 💸
Human-readable names (you.near) make life so much easier. 😌 Plus, meta-transactions mean users don’t even need NEAR tokens to use your dApp. Boom. 💥 Web3 onboarding just got smoother.
My take? Ethereum’s UX is stuck in 2017. NEAR actually gets it. 🧠
Final Call: Legacy 🏛️ vs. Future-Proof 🚀
Both chains are building the future—just differently.
Pick Ethereum if…
You need max security 🔐 and don’t mind wrestling L2s. The ecosystem’s huge, the tools are solid, and you’re okay with some chaos. 🌪️Pick NEAR if…
You care about UX 😊, predictable costs 💰, and a single scalable L1. You’re cool with Rust 🦀 and want a chain that actually thinks about users.
So… what’s your move? 🤔 Legacy or next-gen? 🚀
This content originally appeared on DEV Community and was authored by Wano sike
Wano sike | Sciencx (2025-08-11T20:49:41+00:00) The Dev’s Choice: NEAR vs. Ethereum – The OG 🏰 vs. The New Kid on the Block 🚀. Retrieved from https://www.scien.cx/2025/08/11/the-devs-choice-near-vs-ethereum-the-og-%f0%9f%8f%b0-vs-the-new-kid-on-the-block-%f0%9f%9a%80/
Please log in to upload a file.
There are no updates yet.
Click the Upload button above to add an update.