This content originally appeared on HackerNoon and was authored by Bayesian Inference
Table of Links
Background and 2.1. Related Work
2.2. The Impact of XP Practices on Software Productivity and Quality
2.2. The Impact of XP Practices on Software Productivity and Quality
A number of Studies were conducted to assess the impact of XP practices such as Pair Programming, Test Driven Development and Onsite Customer practices in the software Productivity and quality. Those contributions study the impact of such practices on the Project Velocity and the product defect rates.
\ A number of quantitative studies conducted to assess the validity and efficiency of the Pair Programming practice. Some of these contributions study the impact of the Pair Programming practice on the Project velocity. Generally speaking, According to those studies, Pair Programming increases the Project Velocity by a factor starting from 0 (no change) to 45%.
\ In [7], the authors conducted found that pair programming is 40-50% faster than solo programming. In addition, the pairs implement the same functionality with 20% fewer line of codes than the solo students. In [8], The results showed that there is no significant difference in the average development time between XP with pair programming and XP without Pair Programming. In [9], the authors found that the PP group spends 19% less time than individuals to complete the same project. In [10], the authors found that Pair Programming does not improve neither the quality nor the productivity.
\ A number of quantitative studies conducted to assess efficiency of the Test Driven Development practice. Some of these contributions study the impact of this practice on the Project velocity and the product defect rate. Generally speaking, According to those studies, Test Driven Development results in increasing the project time by a factor starting from 0 (no increase) in some studies to 80% in others. On the other hand, Test Driven Development results in reducing the defect rate by a factor of 40% in some contributions.
\ In [11], the authors reported an improvement in quality achieved by a team following test-during-coding process ranged from 38% to 267% fewer defects. Unfortunately, testduring-coding process increase the development time by a factor from 60% to 100%. In [12], the authors reported that the TDD developers took more time (16%) than those not using this practice, but produced higher code quality by a factor of 18%.
\ A number of studies consider the impact of the Onsite Customer Practice. In [13], the authors reported a reduction in the development effort by a percentage of 5.48%. In [14] four case studies with different degrees of customer interaction were considered. The authors measured the effort spent to fixing defects in the four cases. In the very high customer involvement case, only 6 percent of the effort was spent to fixing defects. However, in the low level of customer involvement, the time spent fixing defects reached about 40 percent.
\
:::info Authors:
(1) Mohamed Abouelelam, Software System Engineering, University of Regina, Regina, Canada;
(2) Luigi Benedicenti, Software System Engineering, University of Regina, Regina, Canada.
:::
:::info This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED license.
:::
\
This content originally appeared on HackerNoon and was authored by Bayesian Inference
Bayesian Inference | Sciencx (2025-08-26T02:06:18+00:00) The Role of Onsite Customers in Agile Software Development. Retrieved from https://www.scien.cx/2025/08/26/the-role-of-onsite-customers-in-agile-software-development/
Please log in to upload a file.
There are no updates yet.
Click the Upload button above to add an update.