This content originally appeared on DEV Community and was authored by testdino
12+ years in QA taught me one thing: flaky tests are the worst part of the job. You run a test, it fails; run it again, it passes. Two hours later, nothing is wrong. Sound familiar? I have been there many times. My team was there, and so were others.
Only QAs understood the failures. We spent 6 to 8 hours weekly deciding if failures were real or flaky, even with stable locators and proper waits. Developers would ask, "Is this a real bug?" Product managers could not tell if it was important or just noise. That is how automated tests lose credibility with the team.
So we built TestDino, a smart reporting and analytics layer for Playwright teams. TestDino collects logs from every CI, builds meaningful metrics, and uses machine learning to tag failures to make results clear for the whole team. When something breaks, the team sees what happened and why it matters. No more "let me check if this is real." No more hours lost to flaky debugging.
TestDino Started as Our Internal Need
Here's the thing. We didn't set out to build a product. We built TestDino because we needed it ourselves.
My team had to sift through a ton of test reports. Every morning, same ritual: open CI logs, check failures, open another tab for yesterday's results, compare, guess if it's flaky, message the developer, wait for response. Repeat for each failure. We were spending more time managing test results than actually improving our tests.
I kept thinking: we have AI that can write entire test suites, but we're still manually checking if a button click failed because of a network timeout or an actual bug. Something was broken in how we work.
So we started small. Built a tool that would collect our Playwright reports and use AI to classify failures. Just three categories at first: real bug, flaky test, UI change. The moment we turned it on, everything changed. What took us 2 hours now took 10 minutes. Developers stopped asking "Is this real?" because the answer was right there with a confidence score.
Then, other teams in the company wanted in. Then, friends at other companies asked if they could use it. That's when we realized: this wasn't just our problem. The whole industry needed this.
Why Every Feature in TestDino Exists
Let me walk you through what we built and why each piece matters.
AI Classification That Works!
We don't just say "test failed." TestDino tells you: this is an unstable test (87% confidence), or this is an actual bug (92% confidence), or this is a harmless UI change (95% confidence).
Why does this matter? Because your team stops wasting time on false alarms. When a developer sees "Actual Bug - 92% confidence," they know to drop what they're doing. When they see "Unstable Test - 87% confidence," they know QA will handle it. Clear ownership. No confusion.
Git-Aware Intelligence
Every failure links to the exact PR and branch that caused it. Not just "LoginTest failed." But "LoginTest failed after PR #234 changed the auth flow."
This changes everything. Instead of everyone pointing fingers, you know exactly what changed and who can fix it. We post summaries directly to Slack. The person who broke it finds out immediately, not three days later during release.
Single Source of Truth
Before TestDino, our test results lived in five places. CI logs here, local reports there, someone's spreadsheet, random Slack threads. Now? One place. Every run, every environment, every branch.
Filter by committer to see what Bob broke today. Filter by environment to check if staging is stable. Filter by duration to see if things got worse after the last deploy. All in seconds, not hours of digging.
Analytics That Show Patterns
Here's what most teams miss: flaky tests have patterns. They fail more on Mondays (server load). They fail after certain deploys (memory leaks). They fail in specific sequences (race conditions).
TestDino tracks flakiness over time, execution speed distribution, and retry patterns. You start seeing things like "SearchTest fails 40% of the time after AuthTest runs" or "All tests got 2x slower after the December 15 deploy." These patterns were always there. We just couldn't see them so clearly before.
Speed Distribution Analysis
We show you not just the average test duration, but the full distribution. Why? Because averages lie. If your login test usually takes 2 seconds but sometimes takes 30, that average of 4 seconds tells you nothing. The distribution shows you have a timeout problem, not a performance problem.
The Real Impact
Want to know the real difference TestDino makes? My own team told me, "We stopped hating test failures." Why? Because they can finally make sense of it all without losing hours. So that's it. That's the whole point.
Tests fail. That's their job - to catch problems. But when you can't tell real problems from noise, when debugging takes longer than fixing, when nobody trusts the results anymore, that's when teams give up on testing.
TestDino brings trust back. Your tests become a tool again, not a burden.
Want to save your team 6 to 8 hours per week on test debugging? I would love to help. We are now selecting a few Playwright teams for a free beta with lifetime pricing benefits. Comment "Testdino" below, and I will reach out with early access details.
This content originally appeared on DEV Community and was authored by testdino
testdino | Sciencx (2025-08-27T07:38:32+00:00) How I Got the Idea for TestDino. Retrieved from https://www.scien.cx/2025/08/27/how-i-got-the-idea-for-testdino/
Please log in to upload a file.
There are no updates yet.
Click the Upload button above to add an update.