This content originally appeared on DEV Community and was authored by Nishant Modi
According to a Software Engineer Who Landed 5 Tech Offers from FAANG and Unicorn Startups.
When applying for my first software engineering role, I sent out 367 cold emails and LinkedIn messages. This resulted in 21 technical phone screens and ultimately five full-time offers from companies like Meta, Stripe, and three high-growth startups.
However, most of those interviews only materialized after I started doing two crucial things: first, extensive networking with engineering managers, tech recruiters, and developers already working at my target companies; and second, completely revamping my resume based on their insider feedback.
Here are the five biggest resume mistakes I identified, along with the changes needed to maximize your chances of landing that first technical interview.
Mistake #1: Putting Education Above Experience
While your CS degree from a top university or that bootcamp certification might be your pride and joy, placing education above your GitHub projects and technical experience is killing your chances.
The Insight: Engineering managers and tech recruiters know that your side projects, open-source contributions, and even hackathon participation demonstrate real coding ability far better than your GPA or coursework list.
When a hiring manager scans your resume, if they immediately see "Relevant Coursework: Data Structures, Algorithms, Operating Systems," they're thinking, "So what? Every CS grad took these." Meanwhile, they're missing your deployed full-stack app with 1,000+ users.
The Fix: Lead with your technical experience.
Imagine an engineering manager opening your resume and immediately seeing: "Built and deployed a React/Node.js app handling 10,000+ API calls daily" or "Contributed to Mozilla's open-source codebase, merged 3 PRs improving performance by 15%." They're thinking, "This person actually ships code. They might help us with our current sprint."
Mistake #2: Not Showing Technical Impact
Too many developers write vague bullets like: "worked on backend services," "participated in agile development," or "assisted with debugging." These tell me nothing about your actual contributions or technical skills.
The Fix: Be specific about technologies and outcomes.
Instead of "worked on backend services," write: "Optimized PostgreSQL queries reducing API response time from 800ms to 150ms, improving user experience for 50,000+ daily active users." This shows you understand performance, can measure impact, and work with real technologies.
Mistake #3: Failing to Include Metrics That Matter
As developers, we often struggle to quantify our work, especially on internal tools or early-stage startup projects where user numbers aren't impressive yet.
The Key Takeaway: Tech recruiters care more about showing you understand what metrics matter than having huge numbers.
Developer-Specific Quantification Strategies:
- Performance Metrics: "Reduced build time by 40% through webpack optimization"
- Code Quality: "Achieved 95% test coverage on critical payment processing module"
- Scale Indicators: "Designed system architecture supporting 100,000 concurrent WebSocket connections"
The "So What?" Method for Devs:
Starting point: Built a task management app
- So what? It uses real-time sync with WebSockets
- So what? Handles 500+ concurrent users with 99.9% uptime
- So what? Led to 30% improvement in team productivity when adopted internally
Mistake #4: Not Tailoring for Role Requirements
I used to spray and pray with the same generic "Full-Stack Developer" resume for every position, whether it was a React-heavy frontend role or a Python backend position.
The Reality in Tech: ATS systems and recruiters are looking for specific technologies. If the job posting mentions React, TypeScript, and GraphQL, but your resume only shows "JavaScript experience," you're getting filtered out.
The Fix:
Focus: Target 3-5 similar roles (e.g., all Senior Frontend positions)
Stack Matching: Reorganize your skills section to lead with the exact technologies they're using
Project Highlighting: If applying for a Node.js role, make sure your Node projects are prominently featured, even if your Python projects are more impressive
Pro Tip: Create a "Core Skills" section with the must-have technologies for each role at the top, then a broader "Additional Technologies" section below.
Mistake #5: Overlooking Technical Presentation Details
This includes formatting inconsistencies, but also tech-specific issues like inconsistent naming conventions (JavaScript vs JS vs javascript), outdated technology names (Angular.js instead of Angular), or listing "HTML/CSS" as programming languages.
The Developer's Attention to Detail: Engineering managers often say, "If they can't maintain consistency in a one-page document, how will they maintain our codebase?"
The Fix:
- Use consistent technology naming (check official documentation)
- Order skills logically (languages, frameworks, tools, databases)
- Ensure your GitHub links work and repos have good READMEs
- Format code-related content consistently (always use monospace for code snippets if including any)
Have at least one senior developer review your resume.
Ready to beat the ATS and land more technical interviews? I built Careerkit.me to help developers create resumes that actually get past the filters. Build your professional, ATS-optimized resume for FREE at Careerkit.me – no credit card required.
Join 10,000+ developers who've already upgraded their job search game!
This content originally appeared on DEV Community and was authored by Nishant Modi
Nishant Modi | Sciencx (2025-10-23T20:49:01+00:00) 5 Resume Mistakes You MUST Avoid. Retrieved from https://www.scien.cx/2025/10/23/5-resume-mistakes-you-must-avoid/
Please log in to upload a file.
There are no updates yet.
Click the Upload button above to add an update.