Code Smell 313 – “Workslop” in AI-Assisted Programming

AI makes it easy to ship code that compiles but doesn’t actually represent your domain — “workslop.” It shows up as hollow logic, unclear intent, missing edge cases, and fake productivity that turns into technical debt. The fix is human: validate AI output against real scenarios, rewrite vague parts, add domain meaning, refactor for clarity, and get peer review. AI can point out patterns, but only you can restore intent and own the code.


This content originally appeared on HackerNoon and was authored by Maximiliano Contieri

When AI Fills the Gaps, You Should Think Through

TL;DR: Workslop happens when you accept AI-generated code that looks fine but lacks understanding, structure, or purpose.

Problems 😔

  • Hollow logic
  • Unclear or ambiguous intent
  • Misleading structure
  • Disrespect for human fellows
  • Missing edge-cases
  • Fake productivity
  • Technical debt

Solutions 😃

  1. Validate generated logic in real-world scenarios
  2. Rewrite unclear parts
  3. Add domain meaning
  4. Refactor the structure for clarity
  5. Add a human peer review
  6. Clarify the context

If you want, I can create a full list of 25+ solutions to completely fight workslop in teams and code.

Refactorings ⚙️

https://hackernoon.com/improving-the-code-one-line-at-a-time?embedable=true

https://hackernoon.com/refactoring-005-replace-comment-with-function-name?embedable=true

https://hackernoon.com/refactoring-013-eliminating-repeated-code-with-dry-principles?embedable=true

https://hackernoon.com/refactoring-032-apply-consistent-style-rules?embedable=true

https://hackernoon.com/refactoring-016-building-with-the-essence?embedable=true

Context 💬

You get "workslop" when you copy AI-generated code without understanding it.

The code compiles, tests pass, and it even looks clean, yet you can’t explain why it works.

You copy and paste code without reviewing it, which often leads to catastrophic failures.

https://hackernoon.com/from-helpful-to-harmful-how-ai-recommendations-destroyed-my-os?embedable=true

Sample Code 📖

Wrong ❌

def generate_invoice(data):
    if 'discount' in data:
        total = data['amount'] - (data['amount'] * data['discount'])
    else:
        total = data['amount']
    if data['tax']:
        total += total * data['tax']
    return {'invoice': total, 'message': 'success'}
def calculate_total(amount, discount, tax):
    subtotal = amount - (amount * discount)
    total = subtotal + (subtotal * tax)
    return total

def create_invoice(amount, discount, tax):
    total = calculate_total(amount, discount, tax)
    return {'total': total, 'currency': 'USD'}

Detection 🔍

  • [x] Manual

You feel like the code "just appeared" instead of being designed.

Tags 🏷️

  • Declarative Code

Level 🔋

  • [x] Intermediate

Why the Bijection Is Important

When you let AI generate code without verifying intent, you break the bijection between your MAPPER and your model.

The program stops representing your domain and becomes random syntax that only simulates intelligence.

AI Generation 🤖

This is an AI-specific code smell.

AIs can produce large volumes of plausible code with shallow logic.

The result looks professional but lacks cohesion, decisions, or constraints from your actual problem space.

AI Detection 🧲

You can also use AI-generated code detectors.

AI can highlight missing edge cases, repeated logic, or meaningless names, but it can’t restore the original intent or domain meaning.

Only you can.

Try Them! 🛠

:::info Remember: AI Assistants make lots of mistakes

:::

Suggested Prompt: Give more meaning to the code

| Without Proper Instructions | With Specific Instructions | |----|----| | ChatGPT | ChatGPT | | Claude | Claude | | Perplexity | Perplexity | | Copilot | Copilot | | You | You | | Gemini | Gemini | | DeepSeek | DeepSeek | | Meta AI | Meta AI | | Grok | Grok | | Qwen | Qwen |

Conclusion 🏁

Workslop smells like productivity but rots like negligence.

You protect your craft when you question every line the machine gives you. Think, design, and own your code.

Remember, YOU are accountable for your code. Even if Artificial Intelligence writes it for you.

Have you noticed the copied and pasted text above?

If you want, I can create a full list of 25+ solutions to completely fight workslop in teams and code.

Related Reading

https://hackernoon.com/code-smell-06-trying-to-be-a-clever-programmer?embedable=true

https://hackernoon.com/how-to-find-the-stinky-parts-of-your-code-part-xxxx?embedable=true

https://hackernoon.com/code-smell-273-overengineering?embedable=true

https://hackernoon.com/code-smell-238-dealing-with-entangled-code?embedable=true

\ https://hbr.org/2025/09/ai-generated-workslop-is-destroying-productivity?embedable=true

:::warning Disclaimer: Code Smells are my opinion.

:::

:::info Feature image by ZHENYU LUO on Unsplash

:::


The most disastrous thing you can ever learn is your first programming language.

Alan Kay

https://hackernoon.com/400-thought-provoking-software-engineering-quotes?embedable=true


This article is part of the CodeSmell Series.

https://hackernoon.com/how-to-find-the-stinky-parts-of-your-code-part-i-xqz3evd?embedable=true

\


This content originally appeared on HackerNoon and was authored by Maximiliano Contieri


Print Share Comment Cite Upload Translate Updates
APA

Maximiliano Contieri | Sciencx (2025-11-02T15:12:30+00:00) Code Smell 313 – “Workslop” in AI-Assisted Programming. Retrieved from https://www.scien.cx/2025/11/02/code-smell-313-workslop-in-ai-assisted-programming-2/

MLA
" » Code Smell 313 – “Workslop” in AI-Assisted Programming." Maximiliano Contieri | Sciencx - Sunday November 2, 2025, https://www.scien.cx/2025/11/02/code-smell-313-workslop-in-ai-assisted-programming-2/
HARVARD
Maximiliano Contieri | Sciencx Sunday November 2, 2025 » Code Smell 313 – “Workslop” in AI-Assisted Programming., viewed ,<https://www.scien.cx/2025/11/02/code-smell-313-workslop-in-ai-assisted-programming-2/>
VANCOUVER
Maximiliano Contieri | Sciencx - » Code Smell 313 – “Workslop” in AI-Assisted Programming. [Internet]. [Accessed ]. Available from: https://www.scien.cx/2025/11/02/code-smell-313-workslop-in-ai-assisted-programming-2/
CHICAGO
" » Code Smell 313 – “Workslop” in AI-Assisted Programming." Maximiliano Contieri | Sciencx - Accessed . https://www.scien.cx/2025/11/02/code-smell-313-workslop-in-ai-assisted-programming-2/
IEEE
" » Code Smell 313 – “Workslop” in AI-Assisted Programming." Maximiliano Contieri | Sciencx [Online]. Available: https://www.scien.cx/2025/11/02/code-smell-313-workslop-in-ai-assisted-programming-2/. [Accessed: ]
rf:citation
» Code Smell 313 – “Workslop” in AI-Assisted Programming | Maximiliano Contieri | Sciencx | https://www.scien.cx/2025/11/02/code-smell-313-workslop-in-ai-assisted-programming-2/ |

Please log in to upload a file.




There are no updates yet.
Click the Upload button above to add an update.

You must be logged in to translate posts. Please log in or register.